Begin with the work

List the capabilities that matter for the role and describe how each appears in day-to-day work. Avoid vague categories such as cultural fit. A score for stakeholder communication is easier to discuss when it refers to explaining a trade-off or resolving conflicting priorities. Keep the number of assessed capabilities manageable.

Give the interview a shared structure

OPM describes structured interviews using predetermined questions and a common approach to scoring responses. For a hiring team, the practical lesson is to agree on questions and evaluation criteria before meeting applicants. A scorecard in an ATS should support this agreement rather than become a substitute for it.

Record evidence before discussion

Ask interviewers to enter observations independently before the panel meeting. Distinguish what the candidate said or demonstrated from an interviewer’s interpretation. Include an option for insufficient evidence rather than forcing a confident numerical score. Disagreement can expose an unclear question or a missing follow-up, not merely an inconsistent interviewer.

Calibrate and revise

Use practice answers to discuss what different ratings mean. After a hiring cycle, review questions that repeatedly produced weak evidence. Keep revisions documented so historical scores are not treated as directly comparable when the rubric changed. Technology makes forms available; the team still owns the quality of the assessment.

MondayFound Editorial · HR technology & hiring practiceBack to insights ↗